Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Sichuan Mental Health ; (6): 440-443, 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-987486

ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo analyze the drop-out rate of participants in antidepressant clinical trials and to explore the related influencing factors. MethodsA retrospective analysis was carried out on the participants of 9 antidepressant clinical trials conducted at the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from 2013 to 2020. A self-compiled questionnaire was used to collect the subjects' demographic data, disease characteristics and the final completion of the trial, thereafter, the participant drop-out rate and related influencing factors were discussed. ResultsA total of 157 cases were enrolled, including 120 cases completed and 37 cases dropped out the trail. The causes of drop-out were poor efficacy in 13 cases (35.14%), presence of adverse reactions in 12 cases (32.43%), withdrawal of informed consent in 8 cases (21.62%) and loss of follow-up in 4 cases (10.81%). Correlation analysis showed that participant drop-out was positively correlated with the level of anxiety (r=0.224, P<0.01) and presence of adverse events (r=0.158, P<0.05), meantime, negatively correlated with the level of education (r=-0.209, P<0.01) and overall efficacy (r=-0.545, P<0.01). Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that education level (β=-0.611, OR=0.543, P<0.05), number of visits (β=-1.831, OR=0.160, P<0.01) and overall efficacy (β=-2.286, OR=0.102, P<0.01) were the influencing factors of participant drop-out. ConclusionLow education level, first visit, poor outcome, high level of anxiety, and adverse events are the factors affecting participant drop-out in antidepressant clinical trials.

2.
Chinese Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases ; (12): 652-656, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-824196

ABSTRACT

To investigate the effect of multiple factors, including breast-feeding and modes of birth, on gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Methods This was a cross-sectional study. A total of 92 children, aged 2 to 10 years, with a diagnosis of ASD by DSM-5 criteria, along with 84 age-matched typical developing (TD) children as control, were enrolled in this study. The six-item gastrointestinal symptom index (6-GSI) was used for symptomatic survey. The self-made questionnaires were used to collect information on dietary preferences, sleep problems and breast-feeding. Results Constipation from 6-GSI was higher in ASD group than in TD group (P<0.01). Stratified analysis revealed that total GI symptom scores (P=0.030), fecal odor (P=0.028) and abdominal pain (P=0.022) were higher in ASD children born by c-section than ASD children born vaginally whereas only abdominal pain was higher in TD children born by C-section than TD children born vaginally (P=0.016). ASD children with pick eating had higher scores in diarrhea (P=0.048) and abdominal pain (P=0.013) than those without. ASD children with sleep disorders had higher scores in constipation (P=0.008), diarrhea (P=0.020) and fecal odor (P=0.027) than those without. There was also a significant difference in constipation from 6-GSI between mainly breast-fed children and mainly formula-fed children among all subjects (P=0.026). Conclusion ASD children have more severe constipation than TD children. ASD children with pick eating or with sleep disorders tend to have more GI symptoms, including diarrhea, fecal odor, and abdominal pain, while breastfeeding can alleviate these symptoms.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL